News & Updates1 min read

NEET 2026 Round 2: Seat Availability, Cutoffs and Choice Strategy

NEET 2026 Round 2 may offer more MBBS seats, but cutoff trends vary by category, state, quota and college fee.

R
Ravi Saini
NEET 2026 Round 2: Seat Availability, Cutoffs and Choice Strategy

NEET 2026 Round 2 may offer more options than the first round. Fewer students qualified this year, while the number of MBBS seats increased. This has pushed many open-category cutoffs to deeper ranks, especially in the All India Quota (AIQ) and several state counselling systems.

But the change is not the same for every student. Reserved-category cutoffs have become tighter in many places. Your category, rank, domicile, fee limit and choice list will all shape your chances.

Why Round 2 has more seats this year

About 11.21 lakh students qualified for NEET counselling in 2026. This is around 1.15 lakh fewer than the 12.37 lakh who qualified in 2025.

At the same time, the National Medical Commission listed 1,36,939 MBBS seats for 2026-27. That is about 9,911 more seats than last year. Nearly 80 per cent of the new seats are in private medical colleges, but government seats also rose by about 4 per cent.

The AIQ offered around 3,500 more MBBS seats in Round 1 than it did last year. Karnataka recorded one of the largest increases in government-quota seats, with more than 25 per cent extra seats in its Round 1 pool.

This mix of fewer qualified students and more seats has helped open-category candidates. It does not mean every college will see a large drop in its cutoff. Medical counselling has many moving parts, and seats do not behave like a neat queue at the canteen.

Open-category cutoffs moved to deeper ranks

In the AIQ government colleges, the median closing rank for open seats moved from about 10,160 in Round 1 last year to 10,957 this year. A deeper closing rank means a student with a higher AIR may still get a seat.

For example, Bundelkhand Medical College in Sagar closed at rank 9,704 in 2025 and 10,356 in 2026. Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College in Bhagalpur moved from 9,419 to 10,357.

A student with rank 10,000 would have missed both colleges last year but could have received either one in Round 1 this year.

The trend differs by state. Uttar Pradesh did not add government seats to its pool and saw some cutoffs move in the opposite direction. Use national trends as a guide, not as a promise.

Reserved-category candidates should reset old expectations

SC and ST candidates need to study this year's data with care. In a comparison across 17 counselling authorities, SC or ST cutoffs became tighter in 16.

In the AIQ, the median SC closing rank moved from 70,965 to 66,299. The ST closing rank moved from 99,522 to 94,782. Smaller rank numbers mean a candidate needed a better rank to reach the same type of seat.

The change was sharper in some states. Rajasthan's ST median moved from 81,497 to 67,369. Bihar's ST median moved from 1,15,642 to 76,146.

These figures do not prove that admission became harder for every candidate. The number of test takers and the category mix also changed. Still, students should not build a Round 2 list only around last year's closing ranks. Add safe choices, target choices and a few reach choices.

Some states have already crossed last year's final-round level

Round 1 in six states has reached or crossed the last government-college boundary from Round 3 of 2025 for open seats.

  • Karnataka: Round 1 reached rank 68,251, compared with 55,000 after last year's Round 3.
  • West Bengal: Round 1 reached 54,272, compared with 46,820 last year.
  • Andhra Pradesh: Round 1 reached 68,353, compared with 59,770.
  • Gujarat: Round 1 reached 78,940, compared with 72,504.
  • Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu: Round 1 was close to last year's final boundary.

This creates room for movement in Round 2, but it does not show how far each cutoff will fall. The result depends on upgrades, withdrawals, new seats and the number of higher-ranked candidates who want the same college.

Check clear and virtual vacancies before choice filling

The MCC and state authorities publish vacancy lists before Round 2. A clear vacancy is open for allotment. A virtual vacancy is held by a student who has asked for an upgrade. If that student gets a new seat, the old seat may become available.

Check vacancies by college, quota and category. A college may show many vacancies in total but have none in your category. Read the seat matrix before you arrange your choices.

If you already hold an R1 seat, compare its fee, location, course details and upgrade chances with the choices you plan to add. Follow the rules for reporting, willingness and fee payment. Missing a deadline can cancel a good seat faster than a weak choice list.

Private colleges with government-quota seats may be within reach

Several states reserve seats in private colleges for government-quota counselling. These seats are allotted on merit but cost more than seats in government colleges.

In Uttar Pradesh, government-quota fees can range from about Rs 16 lakh to Rs 18 lakh a year. In Rajasthan, the cost may reach Rs 25 lakh a year. Check the full fee, hostel cost, bond rules and refund policy before selecting such a seat.

Round 1 cutoffs for these seats moved deeper in many states. The median closing rank in Uttarakhand moved from 2.27 lakh in 2025 to 4.25 lakh in 2026. In Uttar Pradesh, it moved from 2.49 lakh to 4.39 lakh. Karnataka moved from 46,847 to 74,882.

What to do before Round 2

  1. Check the latest MCC or state vacancy list.
  2. Use this year's Round 1 cutoff as your main guide.
  3. Keep government colleges, private government-quota seats and other valid options separate.
  4. Review the fee before adding a private college.
  5. Fill enough choices in a sensible order.
  6. Track the reporting date and upgrade rules on the official counselling website.
Tags:NEET 2026NEET Round 2MBBS AdmissionMCC CounsellingMedical CounsellingNEET CutoffAIQ Counselling

Enjoyed this story?

Share it with your fellow students and colleagues.

R

Written By

Ravi Saini

Exams & educational content expert and contributor at Academy Check. Passionate about helping students find the best educational resources and achieve their academic goals.